Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2026 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Clinical Data Indicates System Reduces Surgical Site Complications In C-Section Patients

April 5, 2013 By AxoGen, Inc.

Smith & Nephew, the global medical technology business, today announces data from two independent clinical evaluations that indicate favorable results in preventing surgical site infections when using the PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO) post-operatively following a Caesarean section.

Jeanette Harris, Infection Preventionist, and Evelyn Hickson, Perinatal Clinical Nurse Specialist from MultiCare Health System in the Tacoma, WA area, conducted a study on outcomes from a new post-operative strategy to manage C-sections introduced in January 2012. Analysis of outcomes using the new strategy showed an 83% reduction in surgical site infections (SSI), arriving at a rate of 0.5 percent or six surgical site infections out of a total of 1,200.  The average re-admission stay due to post-operative SSI is seven patient days at a cost of roughly $50,000.1

Under MultiCare’s protocol, patients were separated into high-risk and low-risk categories through a decision tree. Patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater, or had two or more risk factors, for example diabetes, steroid therapy within 48 hours of surgery, autoimmune diseases, hematological disorders, immune suppression, or others were identified as high-risk. High-risk patients were treated with PICO, while OPSITE* Post-Op Visible was used as a low-risk dressing.  ACTICOAT* antimicrobial barrier dressings were used in both risk groups. Before this, standard practice included the use of conventional post-operative dressings on low-risk patients, and conventional negative pressure wound therapy for high-risk patients.

“We are committed to innovation that helps reduce the human and economic cost of wounds,” said Tom Dugan, President, North America, Advanced Wound Management division, Smith & Nephew. “PICO, OPSITE and ACTICOAT are examples of Smith & Nephew’s unique ability to provide a spectrum of wound care options that together give clinicians the flexibility to exercise their best judgment and to develop better ways to serve patients.”

A second study presented by Lindsey Bullough and Diane Wilkinson of the Royal Albert Edward Infirmary in Wigan followed a group of 50 patients who were deemed to be at higher risk of contracting an infection post-C-section due to being clinically obese and had their closed surgical incisions treated with a protocol including the PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System. The results showed that there were no infections and zero re-admissions.

“Infections impact not only the mother and her family but also the health service costs in relation to antibiotic use, general practitioner time and additional care” said Diane Wilkinson, Infection Control, Junior Matron at Royal Albert Edward Infirmary.

“I had an emergency C-section and was a bit nervous about my recovery since I had had an infection with my first C-section,” said Michelle Mann, a mother of three and a patient who was part of the Wigan evaluation. “For me, PICO was as easy as wearing a belt.  It didn’t restrict my movements at all and it was easy to remove for showering. I didn’t have an infection after this surgery and overall my recovery was much better the second time around.”

Related Articles Read More >

The most innovative medical devices of 2026
An illustration showing Corcym's Memo 4D Curve's laser-cut nitinol core.
Laser-cut nitinol and a layered design let these cardiac implants flex
A photo of J&J MedTech SVP and Global Head of Digital Shan Jegatheeswaran.
Where Johnson & Johnson sees opportunity in surgical intelligence
A close of of Medical 21's Maverics graft.
A surgeon’s prayer helped St. Jude Medical founder Manny Villafaña size his latest device
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2026 Arrowfly, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2026 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe