Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2025 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Crowdfunding highlights wearable startups shortcomings, but may prove valuable for corporate players

October 27, 2015 By Nic Abraham

Crowdfunding – where individuals raise money for a project (campaign) in exchange for a pre-release product – has become a popular method for wearable electronics developers to raise money. Kickstarter, the largest non-personal crowdfunding platform founded in 2009, helped raise $500 million for projects in 2014 and $1.72 billion since inception. Crowdfunding has seen its share of wearable success stories; for example, Pebble (a smartwatch) is currently the third largest crowdfunding project, reaching $20 million by March 2015. Corporations are starting to take the lead and also use crowdfunding for their wearable projects; Sony launched a crowdfunding platform in July 2015, which includes projects like Sony’s SmartWatch.

Only 34% of wearable projects on Kickstarter were able to reach their goal amount, and companies also struggle to hit their crowdfunding commitments. To understand crowdfunding in wearables, we analyzed the top wearable projects from top crowdfunding sites Kickstarter and Indiegogo.

unnamed (5)

Crowdfunding results for wearables campaigns.

None of the top five wearable companies on Kickstarter or Indiegogo were able to ship their products out in the estimated timeframe; besides Pebble’s second campaign, these campaigns were on average late by over eight months. This delay reflects the inexperience of such campaigns on their inability to translate from a prototype to high volume manufacturing, and can bring in negative feedback from backers and potential customers. In addition many of these companies required additional funding (both Pebble and Oculus Rift raised rounds over $10 million before their deliveries were fulfilled) as the amount from crowdfunding was not enough. Five companies were able to raise rounds much higher than their initial seed round, which shows that successful crowdfunding demonstrates to investors the market potential for a novel technology.

Post-campaign is another issue entirely; besides Oculus (which Facebook acquired for $2 billion), most of these companies were unable to capitalize on their crowdfunding success. For example, three of these Indiegogo campaigns are unable to deliver; Kryeos went bankrupt before it could complete shipments, Healbe’s product failed to meet consumer expectations, and Ritot doesn’t even have a prototype. Larger companies, like Sony, have a better chance over startups in making successful crowdfunding campaigns. By running its own crowdfunding platform, Sony can get valuable insight on the demographics of customers of new technology to determine if a project in a new area is worth pursuing (like how startups attracted investors with crowdfunding data). Not only does it show which projects are worthwhile, but the demographics and feedback from the campaign can give insight on how to tailor the project further to the needs of customers. Large companies are also able to deliver products in a timely manner as they have the financial backing and manufacturing partnerships to back up the campaign, which will help retain customer loyalty that has plagued the growth of some of the crowdfunded startups.

To read more insights from Lux Research analysts visit Lux Populi.

Related Articles Read More >

A close of of Medical 21's Maverics graft.
A surgeon’s prayer helped St. Jude Medical founder Manny Villafaña size his latest device
A photo of the Paradromics Connexus brain-computer interface on a fingertip.
How Paradromics designed its Connexus brain-computer interface system
The 1.84 volt paper battery (brown circle structure) was tested in pigs with a bioabsorbable radio-frequency identification (RFID) device.
MIT researchers develop bioresorbable batteries for ingestible medical devices
An illustration of HITMAN operating in glioblastoma cells.
MIT researchers develop injectable nanodevices that remotely kill brain tumor cells
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2026 Arrowfly, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2025 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe