Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Medical device miniaturization: How to think of human scale

August 28, 2019 By Chris Newmarker

Shrinking medical technologies could improve patient quality of life. But don’t overlook the challenges that come with medical device miniaturization.

Mike Johnson, Jason Phillips and Mark Burchnall, Stress Engineering Services (SES)

Stress Engineering Services Force-4Failure analysis projects of miniaturized medical devices provide an important lesson: Design solutions need to be customized for the application.

Datasheets and other vendor literature may not provide the accurate picture of a component’s material properties at a miniaturized scale.  Material properties of components may change as the size of components approach the grain structure size and require custom processing to get to the final component construction. Custom component level bench tests need to be completed to fully understand that components performance against its intended requirements.  We’ve often seen such challenges in sealing, assembly features, electrical components and mechanical manipulation components in miniaturized assemblies.

Sterilization techniques, sustained loading/strain, or manufacturing conditions can also affect medical device components in a miniaturized assembly.

At SES’s Force-4 medical device product development group — where we work — we’ve found the best solution is for the design process to begin with discovery and focus on the human context of the miniaturized device.

Our clients are often asking us to make their products as small as possible so that they are better able to interact with patients and improve quality of life during usage. Our approach to medical device miniaturization at Force-4 starts with understanding the environmental requirements that our clients are trying to achieve as well as empathy for user experience. (Are they a consumer, user, patient, or caregiver?)

Often the driving reason for miniaturization is the interest of achieving a better human interfacing device. Whether the device is worn or in the skilled hands of a surgeon, the interaction of human and machine is critical to the design vision. Force-4 through Human Performance Research (in partnership with the AFRL, WPAFB, Human Performance Directorate) has developed design strategies that guide miniaturization and its human integration vision.

Miniaturization and human integration tend to occur on a continuum of four stages:

  • Component Integration — making a device fit to human scale, either wearable for transport or able to be grasped for manipulation. (Smart watches, backpack heart-pump, CF vests)
  • Streamlining —the evolution of a device to become even further integrated into the human form factor with less bulk, greater mobility and more dexterity. (Insulin pumps, multi-feature handheld surgical devices, eyewear with built-in headphones)
  • Hybridizing — taking advantage of a closer and less easily separable connection to the body which speeds information to the senses, heightening performance. (Artificial pancreas, implanted chips, ocular implants, exoskeletons, prosthetics)
  • Remote Integration — furthering capability with accessible features and functionality untethered to direct human-centered form factor. (Robotic surgery, UAVs, IOT sensors)

When planning a miniaturization strategy, it is important to consider the level of needed integration and think of form factor with an eye toward some degree of elasticity. Namely, how can form change and remain effective in the event it needs to be somewhat larger or altered in geometry? The ultimate solution could amount to a combination of the above strategies.

Additionally, the ability to manufacture the device often comes into effect. Miniaturization can significantly challenge traditional methods of manufacturing and automation. It is important to pull in manufacturing expertise during the design process to ensure planning and early technology selection.   That includes considerations of challenges such as material handling for assembly and final packaging.  Issues typically resolved later in the project need to be well thought out early on with experienced personnel to ensure design outcomes are necessary. At Force-4, we focus on our systems engineering to ensure we have collaborated concurrently throughout the design.

There are also final considerations associated with cost. One needs to consider the total cost of the device, regardless of the product lifecycle, if a viable product being taken to market.

In summary, design for miniaturization is driven by the need for devices more highly in-tune with the human form and surrounding environment; this progress will always challenge manufacturing and necessary automation. For Force-4, the challenges around medical device miniaturization mean thinking inside out and outside in — and understanding implied micro to macro relationship of a device’s interaction with the user. Force-4, as a subsidiary of Stress Engineering Services, now completes full product development, sustaining engineering and equipment development as it continues to leverage SES’s strong history in failure analysis and physics-based predictive design analysis.  We merge vision for the human scale and the technical foresight to achieve the supporting miniaturization goals.

Mike Johnson is director of product development, Jason Phillips is manager of industrial design, and Mark Burchnall is senior associate engineer at the Force-4 subsidiary of Stress Engineering Services (SES).

The opinions expressed in this blog post are the author’s only and do not necessarily reflect those of Medical Design and Outsourcing or its employees.

About The Author

Chris Newmarker

Chris Newmarker is the executive editor of WTWH Media life science's news websites and publications including MassDevice, Medical Design & Outsourcing and more. A professional journalist of 18 years, he is a veteran of UBM (now Informa) and The Associated Press whose career has taken him from Ohio to Virginia, New Jersey and, most recently, Minnesota. He’s covered a wide variety of subjects, but his focus over the past decade has been business and technology. He holds bachelor’s degrees in journalism and political science from Ohio State University. Connect with him on LinkedIn or email at cnewmarker@wtwhmedia.com.

Related Articles Read More >

Digital twins
How digital twins could advance cancer care
This is the logo of MedTech Innovator.
MedTech Innovator announces 65 startups for its 2025 cohort
An image of the Abbott Volt PFA System catheter and cart, which helps physicians visualize the location and effectiveness of cardiac ablation.
Abbott’s Volt PFA system isn’t just a catheter and a waveform
This is a portrait photo of Kablooe Design CEO Tom Kramer
Kablooe Design CEO Tom KraMer taps veteran designer Fred Sklenar to steer firm
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
DeviceTalks

DeviceTalks is a conversation among medical technology leaders. It's events, podcasts, webinars and one-on-one exchanges of ideas & insights.

DeviceTalks

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe