Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Senators seek post-market FDA study of pulse oximeters and skin color

August 16, 2022 By Jim Hammerand

A pulse oximeter device being used on a patient's finger

Pulse oximeters have been shown to be less reliable when used on patients with darker skin. (Image from the American Lung Association)

Democratic U.S. senators are prodding the FDA to launch a post-market study of pulse oximeters due to unreliable performance for patients with dark skin.

Pulse oximeters estimate blood oxygen levels (SpO2) and pulse rates in patients using infrared light — usually on a fingertip — at home or in clinical settings. Blood oxygenation is one of the leading vital signs for monitoring and treating COVID patients, but the devices have shown less accuracy for non-white patients than white patients.

RELATED: UCLA prof says racial bias in medical devices like pulse oximeters is based in physics

Citing a need to understand technical improvements that would make the devices more reliable, the lawmakers — Sens. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois), Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts), Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) and Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) — penned a letter to FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf last week.

In it, they followed up on concerns from January 2021 that the unreliability of FDA-cleared pulse oximeters leads to worse health outcomes for non-white people. For example, dangerously low blood oxygen levels in Black patients with COVID might go unnoticed. One recent study found inaccurate measurements meant patients with darker skin received less supplemental oxygen than white patients.

“Black patients were almost 30% and Latino patients were over 20% less likely than white patients to be recognized as eligible for COVID-19 treatments during a pandemic that has disproportionately impacted communities of color and in which Black and Latino patients have a significantly increased mortality risk than their white counterparts,” the senators said in their letter.

The FDA issued a safety communication on pulse oximeters last year and has scheduled a public meeting of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee “to discuss the available evidence about the accuracy of pulse oximeters, recommendations for patients and health care providers, the amount and type of data that should be provided by manufacturers to assess pulse oximeter accuracy, and to guide other regulatory actions as needed.”

Senators seek FDA answers on pulse oximeters

In addition to their request for FDA to initiate a post-market study of pulse oximeters, the senators are seeking information about the agency’s clearance process for the devices.

By Aug. 26, the senators want answers from the FDA about whether the agency has reviewed data on pulse oximeter inaccuracy due to skin pigmentation. They also asked whether the agency collected data on pulse oximeter accuracy for racial and ethnic subgroups when reviewing the devices for clearance.

“Does the FDA plan to adjust accuracy requirements of future pulse oximeters seeking clearance to ensure they are accurate on all patients regardless of skin color?” the senators asked. “If so, are you looking at updating the 510(k) process so devices that have shown bias through peer-reviewed studies or clinical practice may not use the substantial equivalence pathway?”:

The senators also want to know whether there is evidence that other medical devices interact differently with the full range of human skin pigmentation and, if so, how many of those devices are known.

You may also like:

  • BinaxNow COVID-19 Ag Card
    FDA issues new COVID-19 testing guidance to avoid false negatives
  • A lateral flow assay test for measuring COVID-19 immunity
    COVID-19 immunity test developers at MIT seek diagnostic manufacturer
  • A cube-shaped device for COVID testing
    Harvard researchers plan to sell at-home, PCR-grade COVID testing system
  • FDA logo
    FDA details plans to expand remote safety assessments for device…

Related Articles Read More >

A photo of Steri-Tek CEO Larry Nichols and IBA Deputy CEO Henri de Romrée
Steri-Tek plans sterilization capacity expansion with IBA X-ray irradiation
An image of an infusion pump.
Cybersecurity report flags device vulnerabilities and user needs
This is the logo of Tecomet.
Tecomet earns EU MDR certification
Benefits of thermoplastic polyurethane films for wearable devices
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
DeviceTalks

DeviceTalks is a conversation among medical technology leaders. It's events, podcasts, webinars and one-on-one exchanges of ideas & insights.

DeviceTalks

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe