Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • Med Tech Resources
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • The Big 100
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Video
  • 2022 Leadership in MedTech
    • 2022 Leadership Voting!
    • 2021 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
  • Women in Medtech

U.S. Supreme Court kicks Arthrex case back to patent board

June 21, 2021 By Nancy Crotti

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that Patent Trial and Appeal Board judges are unconstitutionally appointed, but that greater supervision by the PTAB director would solve the problem.

The opinion in the case followed a 2019 appeals court ruling in the closely watched patent spat between Arthrex and Smith+Nephew (NYSE:SNN). In the original lawsuit, Smith+Nephew and ArthroCare (which Smith+Nephew acquired in 2014) petitioned for inter partes review of a patent secured by Arthrex. Three patent judges concluded that the patent was invalid.

Arthrex appealed, claiming that the structure of the PTAB violated the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution, which specifies how a president may appoint officers to assist in carrying out their duties. The law that was in effect at the time prohibited the PTAB director from reviewing decisions made by administrative patent judges (APJs).

The high court justices decided today that APJs must at some level be subject to the direction and supervision of an officer nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate — the PTAB director.

“The Constitution therefore forbids the enforcement of statutory restrictions on the Director that insulate the decisions of APJs from his direction and supervision,” chief justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “To be clear, the Director need not review every decision of the
PTAB. What matters is that the Director have the discretion to review decisions rendered by APJs. In this way, the President remains responsible for the exercise of executive power — and through him, the exercise of executive power remains accountable to the people.”

The justices vacated the judgment of the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., and sent Smith+Nephew’s original petition to the PTAB acting director for him to decide whether to rehear it. However, Arthrex is not entitled to a hearing before a new panel of patent judges, Roberts wrote.

“Arthrex is proud that a majority of the Supreme Court agreed with our position regarding the unconstitutionality of the process for oversight of decisions by administrative patent judges,” said John Schmieding, SVP and general counsel for Arthrex, said in an email to Medical Design & Outsourcing. “This is another step to ensure that patent property rights are reviewed under a constitutionally fair process, and Arthrex is honored to have had the opportunity to fight for the Constitution.”

Smith +Nephew did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Minneapolis intellectual property attorney Case Collard described today’s opinion as “a very limited remedy.”

“This limited remedy preserves the IPR (inter partes review) process as we know it, but adds a new wrinkle, allowing APJ decisions to be reviewed by the Director prior to appeal to the Federal Circuit,” said Collard, a partner at Dorsey & Whitney. “Patent challengers will be pleased with the result that keeps the PTAB’s IPR process in their toolbox. There is some concern that by allowing a political appointee to oversee the decisions, it could inject an element of politics that had previously been absent.”

Related Articles Read More >

A portrait of Finnegan attorney Marcelo Barros
Medical device licensing pitfalls to avoid
Ariste Medical co-founder Lisa Jennings
Ariste Medical co-founder sees great potential for drug-coated implants and orthopedics
Kathleen Daley is a partner at Finnegan
How to pass the patent eligibility test for Software as a Medical Device
Johnson & Johnson J&J DePuy Synthes
Surgeon wins $20M verdict against J&J’s DePuy Synthes

DeviceTalks Weekly.

August 12, 2022
DTW – Medtronic’s Mauri brings years of patient care to top clinical, regulatory, scientific post
See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
DeviceTalks

DeviceTalks is a conversation among medical technology leaders. It's events, podcasts, webinars and one-on-one exchanges of ideas & insights.

DeviceTalks

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

Enewsletter Subscriptions

Enewsletter Subscriptions

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to E-newsletter
  • Attend our Monthly Webinars
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2022 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • Med Tech Resources
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • The Big 100
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Video
  • 2022 Leadership in MedTech
    • 2022 Leadership Voting!
    • 2021 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
  • Women in Medtech