Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2026 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

FDA issues new COVID-19 testing guidance to avoid false negatives

August 12, 2022 By Jim Hammerand

BinaxNow COVID-19 Ag Card

New at-home COVID-19 antigen testing guidance recommends repeat testing after a negative result. [Image courtesy of Abbott]

COVID-19 testing should be repeated following a negative result on any antigen test, the FDA said in a move that could increase demand for diagnostics manufacturers.

The latest guidance from the federal health agency is for negative COVID-19 antigen test results regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. The federal agency said recent studies from people likely infected by the omicron variant shows repeat testing increases the chance of an accurate result, reducing the likelihood of spreading the virus.

“At-home COVID-19 antigen tests detect proteins, called antigens, from the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19,” the FDA said yesterday. “At-home COVID-19 antigen tests are less likely to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus than molecular tests, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. This is especially true early in an infection or in people who do not have COVID-19 symptoms. Currently, all at-home COVID-19 antigen tests are FDA-authorized for repeat, or serial use. This means people should use multiple tests over a certain time period, such as 2-3 days, especially when the people using the tests don’t have COVID-19 symptoms.”

The FDA said its guidance applies both to at-home COVID-19 antigen tests available over the counter as well as point-of-care COVID-19 antigen tests performed at a clinic or doctor’s office. A negative point-of-care antigen result calls for serial testing, which can include at-home tests.

False positives are much less likely than false negatives with antigen testing, which is faster and less expensive than the more reliable PCR testing.

RELATED: COVID-19 immunity test developers at MIT seek diagnostic manufacturer

People who have COVID-19 symptoms but test negative should test at least one more time 48 hours after the first negative test. Asymptomatic people who get a negative test should test again 48 hours later, and if that second test is also negative, the FDA recommends a third test in another 48 hours.

How accurate are PCR COVID-19 tests versus at-home antigen tests?

The FDA said molecular COVID-19 tests such as PCR tests detect SARS-CoV-2 virus infections at least 95% of the time, while antigen tests detect infections at least 80% of the time. Both tests are highly accurate when it comes to positive results.

RELATED: Harvard researchers plan to sell at-home, PCR-grade COVID testing system

In a study from October 2021 into February 2022, the FDA, National Institutes for Health (NIH) and University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School compared at-home COVID-19 antigen test performance against molecular testing.

Researchers made the results available to manufacturers of all at-home COVID-19 antigen tests. The FDA urged at-home antigen test developers with emergency use authorization (EUA) to engage with the agency on how to use the study results.

More than 7,000  participants in the study tested at home using an antigen test, and those with negative results repeated testing every 48 hours over 14 days. All participants also sent nasal swabs in to clinical labs for molecular testing to compare results against the at-home results.

“Results from this studyExternal Link Disclaimer show that repeat testing over a longer timeframe improves test performance and increases the likelihood that an at-home COVID-19 antigen test will detect an infection,” the FDA said. “These results have further guided the FDA’s thinking that repeat testing after a negative result with an at-home COVID-19 antigen test reduces the risk of a false negative result.”

New COVID-19 guidance from the CDC

FDA issued the new advice as the CDC dropped its recommendation that people exposed to COVID-19 quarantine to reduce the chances they could spread the virus.

The CDC’s new guidance now says people exposed to COVID-19 should wear a “high-quality mask” (the guidance does not use the term “N-95”) for 10 days and get tested on the fifth day. The CDC said people who are sick and suspect COVID-19 should isolate until they test negative.

The CDC also stopped recommending screening testing of asymptomatic people without known exposures in most community settings.

The highly infectious omicron variant is showing increased evasion to immunity from vaccines and past infections, and leading antibody treatments have lost effectiveness against the variant. The FDA has warned that while antigen tests can still detect omicron infections, they may do so less reliably.

Testing remains a key tool in the fight against COVID-19, along with vaccinations, masking and improved ventilation, the CDC said.

You may also like:

  • A portrait of Dr. Robert Kossmann at Fresenius Medical Care
    What Fresenius learned about COVID, kidneys and dialysis in the…
  • A series of before-and-after brain scans showing improvement in long COVID patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy
    Long COVID study finds potential in hyperbaric oxygen therapy
  • A portrait of Dexcom VP of Global Clinical Initiatives Tomas Walker
    Dexcom focuses on early diabetes diagnosis as COVID links emerge
  • A cylindrical-shaped medical device with a blue cap on one end and a brown cap on the other
    How SeaStar’s device calms hyperinflammation — and could prevent lasting…
  • A portrait of Dr. Philip Adamson
    Expect more heart and lung failure years after COVID, Abbott’s…

About The Author

Jim Hammerand

Jim Hammerand is the managing editor of Arrowfly's Medical Design & Outsourcing, where he leads coverage of medtech innovation, design, engineering and manufacturing. He also reports breaking news at Arrowfly's MassDevice and contributes to our DeviceTalks podcasts and live events. Hammerand has more than two decades of journalism experience spanning newspapers, magazines, websites, live events, radio and TV news. For nearly a decade, Hammerand reported and edited business news for American City Business Journals as a reporter and digital editor at the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal and then as managing editor of the Puget Sound Business Journal in Seattle. He holds degrees in journalism and management from the University of Minnesota and has won journalism awards from the Society of Professional Journalists, American Society of Business Publication Editors, and Trade, Association, Business Publications International. Connect with him on LinkedIn or by email at [email protected].

Related Articles Read More >

The most innovative medical devices of 2026
A photo of PTFE coating delamination.
Passing the tape test doesn’t mean your coating is reliable
An illustration showing Corcym's Memo 4D Curve's laser-cut nitinol core.
Laser-cut nitinol and a layered design let these cardiac implants flex
A photo of J&J MedTech SVP and Global Head of Digital Shan Jegatheeswaran.
Where Johnson & Johnson sees opportunity in surgical intelligence
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2026 Arrowfly, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2026
    • The 2026 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Views
    • Video
  • 2026 Leadership
    • 2025 Winners
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe