Medical Design and Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

3 pitfalls to avoid with your medtech root cause analysis

August 18, 2020 By Nancy Crotti

Using root cause analysis to identify the source of a medical device malfunction is often slow and unproductive. Here are three common errors and strategies to improve results.

Don Baumgarten, Product Creation Studio

(Image by © Anyaivanova | Dreamstime.com)

When a medical device fails to function as intended, the stakes can be high, potentially affecting patient safety and brand reputation and even lead to a recall.

Malfunctions that rarely occur can be the most difficult to resolve and engineers are often directed to rapidly implement a solution. If the reason for the issue is not clearly understood, attempts to fix the problem won’t work. Root cause analysis (RCA) is often the best approach, because it can help determine the specific underlying cause for a malfunction. Here are the typical RCA steps:

  • Clearly describe the device failure.
  • Examine the device design, manufacture, and instructions for use.
  • Identify potential causes of the failure.
  • Analyze potential causes until the root cause is discovered.

Simple, right? Deceptively so. Here are common reasons that root cause investigations fall short, and strategies for success:

Unfocused effort

When a significant medical device malfunction occurs, quick corrective action is needed. But engineers are typically already juggling multiple projects, and managers are busy, too.

Fixing the problem often falls to one or two engineers with no timeline for action or adjustment to their other responsibilities, and little management support. The result is a cursory RCA effort with little chance of success.

To truly tackle the problem, formally create a project team as would be done for any other R&D project. Prioritize the RCA project relative to other projects according to business impact and resource it accordingly. Include the RCA project in regular management project review meetings.

Avoiding vital work

If a device failure is harmful, the need to resolve the problem is urgent. Pressure to move quickly can cause the RCA team to neglect critical thinking and planning and to avoid crucial but time-consuming analyses. The hurried effort is inevitably haphazard and superficial.

Despite the urgency, a systematic approach is critical to success. A systematic approach is thoughtful and efficient, with investigations of the most likely root causes conducted simultaneously to quicken the pace.

A number of well-known problem-solving tools, including the fishbone diagram and process flowchart, are recommended for root cause investigations. Familiar techniques including dimensional inspection, microscopy, oscilloscope signal analysis and debugging tools are essential to analyzing potential root causes.

Faulty conclusions

An assumption might seem smart: The injection molding process was validated, so that can’t be the issue. A single data point can be convincing: The circuit board worked after the capacitor was replaced, so the capacitor was the problem. But assumptions and conclusions based on scant data are often wrong, and that can be disastrous to an RCA effort.

To avoid erroneous decisions, gather compelling data before ruling out a potential cause or declaring that the root cause was discovered. Conduct controlled experiments and use statistical analysis when needed. Avoid over-interpretation of data, and conclude only what the data supports. Conclusions can rarely be made with absolute certainty. Seek strong evidence to make sound decisions.

For intricate systems, there may not be a single root cause. Instead, several contributing factors occur simultaneously to produce the malfunction. Usually two or three dominant factors cause the issue.

The best way to show that the root cause was actually discovered is to reproduce the problem. Deliberately build devices that include the identified root cause and demonstrate that the devices fail. Such evidence will give you confidence that implementing changes to prevent the identified root cause will greatly reduce the failure rate.

Don Baumgarten is the director of mechanical engineering for Product Creation Studio. He has participated in the design and manufacture of medical devices for startups to Fortune 500 companies, including Philips, Boston Scientific, Pathway Technologies and Intellectual Ventures.

The opinions expressed in this blog post are the author’s only and do not necessarily reflect those of Medical Design and Outsourcing or its employees.

Related Articles Read More >

A photo of Capstan Medical's mitral valve implant, which uses nitinol.
Capstan Medical’s R&D head discusses the heart valve and robotics startup’s tech, engineering challenges and solutions, advice for others in medtech and how to join his team
An image of the Abbott Volt PFA System catheter and cart, which helps physicians visualize the location and effectiveness of cardiac ablation.
Abbott’s Volt PFA system isn’t just a catheter and a waveform
A medical device engineer holding a circuit board.
How much do engineers make? Our 2025 Engineering Salary Survey is available now
An image of Abbott's Infinity deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants and leads.
How Abbott developed the first-of-its-kind Infinity DBS system
“mdo
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest medical device business news, application and technology trends.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MDO Digital Edition

Digital Edition

Subscribe to Medical Design & Outsourcing. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading medical design engineering magazine today.

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
DeviceTalks

DeviceTalks is a conversation among medical technology leaders. It's events, podcasts, webinars and one-on-one exchanges of ideas & insights.

DeviceTalks

New MedTech Resource

Medical Tubing

MassDevice

Mass Device

The Medical Device Business Journal. MassDevice is the leading medical device news business journal telling the stories of the devices that save lives.

Visit Website
MDO ad
Medical Design and Outsourcing
  • MassDevice
  • DeviceTalks
  • MedTech100 Index
  • Medical Tubing + Extrusion
  • Medical Design Sourcing
  • Drug Delivery Business News
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing World
  • R&D World
  • About Us/Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to Print Magazine
  • Subscribe to our E-Newsletter
  • Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
  • Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media LLC. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • Home
  • Medical Device Business
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Financial
    • Regulatory
  • Applications
    • Cardiovascular
    • Devices
    • Imaging
    • Implantables
    • Medical Equipment
    • Orthopedic
    • Surgical
  • Technologies
    • Supplies and Components Index
    • Contract Manufacturing
    • Components
    • Electronics
    • Extrusions
    • Materials
    • Motion Control
    • Prototyping
    • Pumps
    • Tubing
  • MedTech Resources
    • Medtech Events in 2025
    • The 2024 Medtech Big 100
    • Medical Device Handbook
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Subscribe to Print Magazine
    • DeviceTalks
    • Digital Editions
    • eBooks
    • Educational Assets
    • Manufacturer Search
    • Podcasts
    • Print Subscription
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • Video
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2021 Winners
  • Women in Medtech
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe